Determine Which of Your Debts Can Be Eliminated in Bankruptcy

discharge in bankruptcy

Bankruptcy debts discharged in Pittsburgh

Bankruptcy Debts Discharged, Part One – Discharge of Student Loans, Credit Card Debt, Medical Debt and Criminal Fines Restitution in Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy debts discharged in any particular consumer case may depend on a number of factors. For people contemplating whether to file a bankruptcy case, the questions about whether certain debts may be discharged through bankruptcy are common. While debtors should discuss their individual circumstances with an experienced Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer, certain rules of thumb may help to determine whether a particular debt may be dischargeable in bankruptcy. This two-part series will explore whether certain kinds of debts can be discharged in bankruptcy.

FREE CONSULTATION – 412-925-8194

Are Student Loans Discharged in Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Debts Discharged?

Student loan debts are sometimes the most oppressive financial obligations for debtors in bankruptcy cases. Many people believe that student loans are not dischargeable in bankruptcy.  In fact, student loan obligations may be discharged in a bankruptcy case. While the United States Bankruptcy Code requires a showing of “undue hardship” to discharge most student loan obligations, student loans may still be discharged in a bankruptcy case. What constitutes “undue hardship” may depend on the governing case law in the court in which you file your bankruptcy case. In the region in which the Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Court is situate, the Brunner standard applies to define the meaning of “undue hardship” and imposes a three-part test which debtors must meet to have their student loans discharged.

Discharge of student loan obligations in bankruptcy must be done by filing an adversary proceeding, or a lawsuit, against the student loan creditor. That law suit will seek a determination that repayment of student loan debts constitutes an undue hardship and that the student loan obligation is dischargeable in bankruptcy.

You may be eligible to discharge your student loan obligations. Talk to an experienced bankruptcy lawyer today

to determine if you can discharge your student loan debt.

Are Credit Card Obligations Bankruptcy Debts Discharged in Pittsburgh?

Generally speaking, credit card obligations are dischargeable in bankruptcy. Congress has emplaced certain protections in the Bankruptcy Code to prevent abuse by limiting discharge for cash advances in the days leading up to the filing of a bankruptcy case. Pittsburgh bankruptcy courts enforce the Bankruptcy Code with exacting attention. In like fashion, the Bankruptcy Code may bar discharge of late-incurred charges for luxury goods. Consumers must honestly discuss their credit card use before the filing of a case with their bankruptcy attorneys. Honest disclosure to your bankruptcy lawyer can often prevent unneeded difficulty in the entry of a discharge order.

FREE CONSULTATION – 412-925-8194

Open field of bankruptcy discharge

debts dischargeable in bankruptcy cases

Are Medical Debts Bankruptcy Debts Discharged?

Pittsburgh bankruptcy cases where the bankruptcy court enters a discharge order almost always result in medical debts being discharged.  Usually medical debts are unsecured obligations that do not enjoy priority protection under the Bankruptcy Code. For that reason, medical debts are dischargeable in most Pittsburgh bankruptcy cases.  While a particular obligation arising from medical debt could be non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, such exceptions are exceptional.  Discuss whether your medical debt may be discharged before you file your bankruptcy case in Pittsburgh with your own Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer.

Are Pittsburgh Criminal Fines or Restitution Orders Bankruptcy Debts Discharged?

Typically criminal fines and restitution are not discharged in bankruptcy cases.  States are empowered to exercise their police power and, with some exceptions, federal bankruptcy law under the United States Bankruptcy Code does not inhibit that exercise of the rights of states.  If you have question whether a particular debt might be dischargeable in your bankruptcy case, consult an experienced bankruptcy lawyer in Pittsburgh during a free initial consultation.

FREE CONSULTATION – 412-925-8194

Up Next: Bankruptcy Debts Subject to Discharge Including Mortgages, Car Loans, Tax Debts, Child Support and Alimony and Judgment Awards in Pittsburgh

Watch for our next installment in this series where we will continue to take up the question of exactly what kinds of debts can be discharged in a bankruptcy case. If you have any particular concerns about whether a certain debt may be discharged in a bankruptcy case, you should contact an experienced Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer today for a free initial consultation.  In Pittsburgh, call 412-925-8194 today.

(c) 2017.  Robleto Law, PLLC.  Robleto Law, PLLC is a law firm of bankruptcy attorneys based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  Our help may involve bankruptcy relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code. We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Bankruptcy Pittsburgh | Find the Best Bankruptcy Lawyer for Your Case

Discharge in Bankruptcy Shown by Piggy Bank

Bankruptcy Discharge Piggy Bank Pittsburgh

Bankruptcy Pittsburgh. Engaging the Best Bankruptcy Lawyer for your Case May Be More Important than you Know.

In Pittsburgh, as in many other fine cities throughout the United States, businesses and consumers in financial turmoil must find the best bankruptcy lawyer to meet their unique circumstances.  Many will begin their search with the cost of a lawyer central in their minds.  In Pittsburgh, bankruptcy matters generally proceed as they do in other major cities; those with the best bankruptcy lawyers generally realize the most favorable outcomes. For that reason, those who seek out a cheap bankruptcy lawyer or the cheapest bankruptcy in Pittsburgh find they may have paid what they wanted but overpaid for what they received.

Those considering filing bankruptcy in Pittsburgh should consider the cost of Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyers.  Generally, by the time debtors meet with their bankruptcy lawyers, they’ve become accustomed to tightening their belts.  However, engaging the cheapest bankruptcy lawyer may quickly prove to be false economy.  In truth, finding the best bankruptcy lawyer for a Pittsburgh bankruptcy must a full examination of the value of that bankruptcy attorney.  Of course, debtor must ask how much does it cost to file bankruptcy in Pittsburgh?  But, when considering the cost of filing bankruptcy in Pittsburgh, debtors must really take into account the complexity of their cases, the extent to which adverse parties may be involved in their bankruptcy cases and what other complications may arise over the course of each bankruptcy case.

FREE CONSULTATION – 412-925-8194

A chapter 11 bankruptcy case in Pittsburgh demands the watchful eye of an experienced Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer. When your business is on the line, along with the livelihood of its owners and employees, focusing on the cheapest bankruptcy lawyer in Pittsburgh is a clear error. For business reorganizations in Pittsburgh bankruptcy courts, realistic officers will hire competent business bankruptcy lawyers. When your business is on the line in bankruptcy, Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer selection could be the most important choice you may have to make.

Chapter 13 debtors face similar issues as do business bankruptcy debtor but on a different scale.  In a chapter 13 bankruptcy, Pittsburgh consumers often need to save their homes, vehicles and other assets that may be critical to the very survival of their families. As with chapter 11 bankruptcy, Pittsburgh needs bright, motivated lawyers to champion the cause of its consumer debtors who need to reorganize their financial burdens.

In chapter 7 bankruptcy Pittsburgh falls in line with other jurisdictions. In chapter 7 bankruptcy, individual debtors in Pittsburgh generally seek a clear pathway to discharge and a fresh start. It is important that in chapter 7 bankruptcy Pittsburgh debtors select a bankruptcy lawyer who will understand their particular circumstances and give them advice that will permit a Pittsburgh bankruptcy judge to award discharge.

In contrast to any other chapter 7 bankruptcy, Pittsburgh business chapter 7 cases demand the close attention of experienced, intelligent, creative and cautious bankruptcy Pittsburgh lawyers. Commercial chapter 7 cases are very different from the ordinary chapter 7 bankruptcy cases. A debtor must always have a good reason to file a bankruptcy in Pittsburgh that is never more pronounced than when it comes to commercial chapter 7 cases. Business debtors wind up their affairs and do not receive a discharge. On the other hand, certain other interested parties do receive the attention of a chapter 7 trustee, the United States trustee and the United States Bankruptcy Judge presiding over their case. There are occasionally (but not often) valid reasons to file a chapter 7 bankruptcy case for an entity that will not continue as a going concern.

At each level and for each chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, finding the best bankruptcy lawyer for a bankruptcy Pittsburgh may be the most important Pittsburgh bankruptcy decision a debtor could make. Contact us today for a free initial consultation. Learn how bankruptcy Pittsburgh can help you move forward with debt relief, a fresh start and a clean bankruptcy Pittsburgh.

Call for Your Free Consultation with a Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer to Discuss Whether Your Debts May be Discharged in Bankruptcy.

FREE CONSULTATION – 412-925-8194

We are a Debt Relief Agency. We Help People File for Relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

(c) 2017 Robleto Law, PLLC- Bankruptcy Lawyers in Pittsburgh.

The Fate of Structured Dismissals in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases

Bankruptcy Exit Strategies in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases Following the Decision of the Supreme Court in Jevic

Business bankruptcy lawyers carefully watched the case of Czyzewski v.  Jevic Holding Corp. as it wended its way from a bankruptcy court in Delaware, through the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and on to the Supreme Court.  At issue in the case was whether a bankruptcy court could enter a dismissal order that provides for distributions in defiance of the priority provisions of the Bankruptcy Code without the consent of affected creditors.  Justice Breyer, writing for the majority, explained that the Court’ simple answer to this complicated question is “no.” Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., 580 U.S. ____, No 15-649, slip op. at 11 (Mar. 22, 2017).

Our simple answer to this complicated question is “no.”

Justice Breyer on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Structured DismissalsNotwithstanding the clarity and simplicity of that answer, the holding of Jevic does not spell the end of structured dismissals or even structured dismissals that depart from the priorities accorded to creditors under the Bankruptcy Code. Rather, Jevic prohibits only orders dismissing chapter 11 cases which provide for a distribution that departs from the priorities set out in the Bankruptcy Code without the consent of the side-stepped creditors with impaired claims.

The Court found important that the two other paths for resolution of a chapter 11 bankruptcy case, plan confirmation or conversion, expressly prohibit courts from circumventing the waterfall of claim priorities.  The absolute priority rule in section 1129(b)(2) prohibits cramdown of a chapter 11 plan upon impaired creditors if the holders of junior claims or interests are to receive anything under the plan.  In a case converted to a case under chapter 7, the trustee is charged with distributing property in keeping with the priority provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.  Section 726 tracks the absolute priority rule scheme set out for cases under chapter 11.

Structured Dismissal Orders in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases After Jevic

We expect that many bankruptcy courts will be inclined to read Jevic narrowly and apply its bar only to those cases where parties seek structured dismissal orders that dishonor the waterfall arrangement of priority of distributions in bankruptcy cases when the adversely affected creditors object to that treatment.  We are certain that, irrespective of how structured dismissal jurisprudence may develop after the Jevic case, business bankruptcy lawyers will continue to press the envelope in terms of creative resolutions in commercial bankruptcies.

 

Bankruptcy Schedules

What Are the Bankruptcy Schedules, Anyway?

Bankruptcy Schedule CThe bankruptcy schedules are the primary forms that debtors use to reveal their basic financial information.  Disclosure of debtors’ financial condition is an essential condition of relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.  The bankruptcy schedules, along with the statement of financial affairs are designed to elicit almost every detail of debtors’ financial condition. From a modest consumer debtor in a case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code with a few thousand dollars in debt to an extraordinarily sophisticated financial services company with liabilities in excess of one billion dollars, all debtors must submit complete and accurate bankruptcy schedules.

“Both business and consumer debtors must submit complete and accurate bankruptcy schedules.”

The following is a concise and plain description of those bankruptcy schedules as they apply to individual debtors in consumer bankruptcy cases.  On December 1, 2015, a new set of forms became effective to all newly filed bankruptcy cases.  Those forms arose from the Judicial Conference Forms Modernization Project.  The new forms track the same information as their predecessors but the design is retouched.  Additionally, the new forms exist in separate sets, applicable to individual debtors and non-individual debtors (think corporations, partnerships and other business organizations).  This review will focus on the new bankruptcy forms schedules A/B, C, D, E, F, H, I and J, as applicable to individual bankruptcy debtors.

Bankruptcy Schedule A/B – Property

Bankruptcy schedule A/B seeks information relevant to a debtor’s interest in property.  Previously, schedule A pertained only to a debtor’s interests in real estate and schedule B sought a listing of all other interests in property that a debtor may have.  Schedule A/B merges those two previously distinct schedules into an integrated, itemized list of various sorts of property.  The first category in schedule A/B is real property (in the parlance of part 1 of bankruptcy schedule A/B, “Each Residence, Building, Land, or Other Real Estate”).  Next, a debtor lists vehicles, followed by personal and household items.  Within those two asset classes, there are further subitems (e.g., electronics, collectables and jewelry).  Next on schedule A/B, a debtor must list all financial assets and business related property.  If a debtor owns farm or commercial fishing-related property, that property must also be detailed on this bankruptcy schedule.  Responses to the specific inquiries on schedule A/B will generally reveal all of a debtor’s property but the final category does not leave the matter to chance and requires a debtor to describe all property not disclosed in response to the prior questions.

Bankruptcy Schedule C – Bankruptcy Exemptions

Bankruptcy schedule C requires that a debtor list all of the property claimed as exempt and therefore unavailable to pay the claims of creditors.  Because Congress left it up to the legislature of the individual states to determine the property that debtors in bankruptcy cases could exempt from creditors, exemption law may vary from state to state.  In many states, a debtor may rely only upon the exemptions available under state law.  In other jurisdictions, a debtor in a bankruptcy case may only apply the “federal” exemptions set out in section 522(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania permits a debtor to elect the federal exemption scheme or Pennsylvania exemption law.

Depending on the circumstances of any particular case, the decision whether to use the federal or state exemptions may have very serious consequences and may impact a debtor’s right to keep certain assets.  After the selection of the appropriate exemption menu, careful application of each exemption is also very critical.  Misapplication of exemptions to assets could result in a debtor being required to turn over property to a chapter 7 trustee to be liquidated for the benefit of the debtor’s unsecured creditors.  In a chapter 13 case, the same mistake could mean that a debtor would be forced to pay a considerably higher amount of money each month.  When it comes to selection and application of bankruptcy exemptions on schedule C, a highly experienced bankruptcy lawyer will help ensure that a debtor maximizes the value of exemption rights in a bankruptcy case.

Bankruptcy Schedule D – Secured Claims

In schedule D, a debtor is called upon to list all secured creditors.  A secured creditor is one that has recourse to a debtor’s property to protect its right to receive payments.  The two most common kinds of secured creditors for most consumers are mortgagees and vehicle lenders.  However, certain tax claims including real estate taxes may also be secured obligations.  Additionally, a creditor with a judgment against a debtor may also hold a secured claim.  That is so because a judgment acts as an automatic lien on all real property that the judgment debtor owns in the property in which the judgment is entered.  A judgment may also form a lien on other property of the debtor if the judgment creditor has taken the necessary steps to perfect its lien before the filing of the bankruptcy case.

“Ignored secured claims can prevent a debtor from getting a meaningful fresh start even if that debtor receives a discharge.”

 Ignored secured claims can prevent a debtor from getting a meaningful fresh start even if that debtor receives a discharge.  Absent a debtor taking some affirmative measure to avoid or limit a secured claim, a lien will generally survive a bankruptcy case even if a debtor otherwise does everything right and receives a bankruptcy discharge.  As with bankruptcy exemption and selection application, an effective bankruptcy lawyer may prove to be critically important to a debtor developing a strategy for the treatment of secured claims.

Bankruptcy Schedule E/F – Unsecured Claims

The new schedule E/F merges the priority claims together with other general unsecured claims against a debtor.  The Bankruptcy Code gives priority to certain types unsecured claims.  Each priority claim is listed in order such that first priority claims must be paid in full before any second priority claim may be paid.  The priority scheme is designed to provide protection to certain kinds of creditors.  Thus, domestic support obligations, wage claims and certain kinds of taxes are designed priority claims and must be identified that way.  Although the new schedule collapses priority and general unsecured claims onto a single bankruptcy schedule, schedule E/F still requires debtors to list priority claims in a separate section on the schedule and to identify the nature of the claim.  Your Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer will help you correctly identify and classify priority claims.

Bankruptcy Schedule G – Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases

Debtors must also list all “executory” contracts and unexpired leases.  Prior to a bankruptcy case, many people ask:  what is an executory contract?  An executory contract is one that has neither terminated nor expired and upon which substantial performance remains due from both parties.  Just like an unexpired lease, an executory contract is a living, binding legal agreement.  Debtors often face difficult decisions about whether to assume or reject an executory contract or unexpired lease.  A clear explanation of the impact of rejection or assumption from a bankruptcy lawyer can make that difficult decision making process far easier.

Bankruptcy Schedule H – Codebtors

As the instructions on bankruptcy schedule H explain “[c]odebtors are people or entities who are also liable for any debts you may have.”  It is important to list all codebtors with names and addresses and identify the debt upon which each codebtor shares liability.  In many cases, the discharge of indebtedness of a debtor in a bankruptcy case may impact a codebtor’s financial life.  It is important to discuss joint liability during a candid conference with a bankruptcy attorney.

Bankruptcy Schedule I – Income

Bankruptcy Schedules Crunching NumbersDebtors must disclose their income from all sources.  Income information is important and, as entered in the means test, may impact a persons qualification for relief under chapter 7.  A debtor must have a regular source of income in order to qualify as a debtor for a case under chapter 13.  Schedule I is detailed and seeks information about income from all sources and requires information about deductions from payroll.  Additionally, if a debtor has a non-filing spouse, that income must be disclosed too unless they are separated and living apart.  Your bankruptcy lawyer can help you to address the implied problem of having someone else’s income imputed to you (even if it is your spouse).

Bankruptcy Schedule J – Expenses

Bankruptcy Schedule J enumerates almost every typical consumer expense and debtors must honestly report their regular monthly expenses.  Calculation of monthly expenses is an important exercise for the debtor and provides critical information to all parties in interest in the case.  Very often the “monthly net income” calculation reached by subtracting expenses from income gives debtors a sense of how their cash flows on a monthly basis.  Schedule J can also help debtors in chapter 13 cases determine whether they can present a chapter 13 plan that they can pay and is therefore, feasible.

It is important to note that bankruptcy schedules I and J seek the sort of information as does the means test.  However, because the income on the means test is a backward-looking analysis of the six-month period preceding the filing of the bankruptcy case, the income information may diverge from that stated in bankruptcy schedule I.  Similarly, the allowable expenses on the means test of primarily grounded in standard expenses having nothing to do with the actual expenses relevant to the debtor.  Discuss these important distinctions with your bankruptcy lawyers.

Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyers and Important Discussions about Bankruptcy Schedules

Disclosure is of income, expenses, assets and liabilities are a cornerstone of every bankruptcy case.  The bankruptcy schedules are designed to facilitate that disclosure.  Complete and accurate responses to all of the questions in the schedules is vital to the bankruptcy process.  Before you file your bankruptcy case, carefully read and understand the information contained in those schedules.  Candid disclosure is an important step in a bankruptcy process which allows honest but unfortunate debtors some relief from their debts with a fresh start.

 

Taking the Mystery and Mean Away From the Bankruptcy Means Test

Means Test and Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

It Has Never Been Easier to Determine Whether You Qualify for Relief Under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in Pittsburgh.

Means TestIn 2005, Congress put in place very substantial changes to the United States Bankruptcy Code through an amendment known as the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA).  The BAPCPA amendments set new requirements for eligibility to be a debtor under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and to receive a discharge under chapter 7.  Importantly, debtors must now undergo a means test if their income exceeds the then-applicable median income for consumers of debtors’ household size in the state in which they reside.

412-925-8194

Eligibility for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy – Median Income Analysis

Debtors whose income does not exceed the relevant median income need not undergo further means testing.  Median incomes information is calculated and published by the United States Census Bureau and median income data is adjusted periodically.  The Office of the United States Trustee publishes median income information on its website.  As of the date of this entry, the median income applicable to debtors in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with a household size of one is $50,501.  A household of two in Pennsylvania can earn up to $60,508 without further means test analysis.  A three-person family in Pennsylvania has a median income of $74,083.  With four people the Pennsylvania median income is $89,690 and increases by $8,400 for each additional member of the household.
Median Household Income in the United States: 2015

[Source: U.S. Census Bureau]

The Bankruptcy Means Test Exception Applicable to People with Primarily Business Debts

Individuals whose debts are primarily business debts are excused from the means testing analysis.  The means test analysis under section 707(b) of the Bankruptcy Code applies to individual debtors whose debts are primarily consumer debts.  A Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer will be able to help you make the determination of whether your debts are primarily consumer debts or whether you may be exempt from further means testing because of the primary nature of your indebtedness.

The Chapter 7 Means Test and the Presumption of Abuse

The chapter 7 bankruptcy means test is codified in section 707 of the Bankruptcy Code and individual chapter 7 bankruptcy debtors in Pittsburgh and throughout the United States must submit an Official Form 122A-1, Chapter 7 Statement of Your Current Monthly Income.  Debtors must disclose information relevant to their income and household size to determine whether they need to complete the means test.  The means test itself is incorporated into Official Form 122A-2, Chapter 7 Means Test Calculation.  Debtors must draw income data for the means test from the income during the six-month period preceding the filing of their bankruptcy cases.  The Bankruptcy Code permits debtors to subtract from their household any portion of the income of a non-filing spouse that is not dedicated to the payment of household expenses or expenses of debtors’ dependents.  The means test also provides that certain expenses be deducted from a debtor’s adjusted current monthly income to determine monthly disposable income.  That monthly disposable income is then multiplied by 60 to determine a debtor’s five-year disposable income.  If a debtor’s disposable income over five years is less than a certain threshold value (currently $7,700), then the presumption of abuse does not arise.  If the five-year income exceeds the threshold value and a cap value (currently $12,850), then the presumption of abuse arises but the debtor may still elect to complete a statement of special circumstances that justify additional expenses or adjustments of current monthly income for which there is no reasonable alternative.  A showing of special circumstances may justify continued eligibility for relief under chapter 7.  If a debtor’s five-year disposable income is between the threshold and cap values, the presumption of abuse will not arise unless the five-year disposable income is at least 25% of the debtor’s total nonpriority unsecured debt.

Close Call on the Means Test?  Discuss it with a Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer!

The increase in the administrative cost and duration of a chapter 13 bankruptcy case from a chapter 7 bankruptcy case is considerable.  In many cases a chapter 13 bankruptcy may be warranted but for other individuals a fresh start under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code will offer the optimal path away from financial distress.  A free consultation with a Pittsburgh bankruptcy attorney could help you understand all of your bankruptcy nonbankruptcy options before making any decision.

412-925-8194

Bankruptcy in Pittsburgh – I Want to Keep My Car!

File Bankruptcy and Keep the Car

bankruptcy keep my carCan I File Bankruptcy and Still Keep My Car – Talk to a Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer Now!

412-925-8194

If you’re considering filing a voluntary bankruptcy case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code or entering into a repayment plan under chapter 13, you may be interested to know how a bankruptcy case might affect your vehicle loan.  Most workers need their vehicles just to bring themselves to work and back.  In most Pittsburgh bankruptcy cases, people can file bankruptcy and keep their cars.  Generally, as long as one continues to pay on his or her vehicle, she may retain it.

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.  If you’re behind on your car payment, you may wish to use chapter 13 to retain that vehicle.  Under chapter 13, debtors may pay into a plan over a period of three to five years and, during that time, they may cure and reinstate certain loan balances.  In most cases, even when a debtor is substantially behind on a vehicle payment, chapter 13 may still offer a pathway to keep that car.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.  Often debtors are not in a position to repay creditors but still want to keep their automobiles.  In those cases, they may usually retain them as long as they keep current on their vehicle payments.   Particularly in this context, its very important to know whether creditors are secured or unsecured and whether they may have priority claim status.  In order to ensure that you are able to retain your interest in your vehicle, contact Robleto Law today.

412-925-8194

We are a debt relief agency.  We help people file for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.  (c) 2017 Robleto Law PLLC  |  Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Law Firm

 

Bankruptcy May Help Get Your Repossessed Vehicle Back

Was Your Vehicle Repossessed in Pittsburgh Before You Were Able to File for Bankruptcy Relief?

Making ends meet in tough times can be difficult enough even before your vehicle is repossessed.  Without your vehicle, you may find it difficult to get to work or a job interview making your troubled financial condition even worse.  If you have experienced a vehicle repossession in Pittsburgh, you may be able to get your car back for good by filing a voluntary petition for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

car repossession

How Vehicle Repossession Works

Vehicle sales in Pennsylvania are typically financed through a retail sales installment contract.  That contract provides the lender with a security interest in the automobile until the loan is paid off.  If a borrower cannot or does not pay regular monthly payments and falls behind, the lender may exercise the legal right to take possession of their collateral and sell it.  Under the Uniform Commercial Code, lenders are required to send notices to borrowers following repossession, advising them of the disposition of the vehicle and what the borrower must do in order to get the vehicle back.  Borrowers may have the right to cure their loans meaning bring the loan current by paying the current and past due amounts owed along with the costs of repossession.  Other borrowers may find that the only rights listed in the notice they received from their lender is a right to redeem the vehicle meaning payment of the entire amount still owed to the lender.

If the lender sells a repossessed vehicle, it must send the borrower a second notice with information about the sale and whether there was a surplus or if the borrower owes a deficiency to the lender.  The form and content of the notices issued by the lender are very important and the failure of a lender to provide notices as mandated by the statute can give rise to a claim for damages against the lender.

Getting Your Repossessed Automobile Back After Filing Bankruptcy

Vehicle lenders are often familiar with the bankruptcy process and will make arrangements with your bankruptcy lawyer for the prompt return of your vehicle.  In certain cases, your bankruptcy lawyer may need to petition the bankruptcy court for the turnover of your vehicle to you.  You will still be required to pay the amounts due to your lender but you may be able to do that over a period of three to five years in a case under chapter 13.  Additionally, in certain circumstances, you may be able to “cramdown” on lender in a case under chapter 13 and compel it to accept only the value of the vehicle even if you owe considerably more than the vehicle is worth.  In a case under chapter 7, you may also be able to redeem your vehicle for less than the amount you owe.  In Pittsburgh, your bankruptcy lawyer may be able to arrange for you to receive a loan for the value of the vehicle that could save you a considerable amount of money, giving you even more freedom to make the most of your fresh start.

Talk to Your Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer to Determine if You Can Get Your Repossessed Vehicle Back by Filing a Bankruptcy Case

Whether you can get your vehicle back by filing a bankruptcy case may depend on several factors.  Timing is very important.  The filing of your bankruptcy case will give rise to the “automatic stay” which will prevent the lender from selling your vehicle.  However, if you file your bankruptcy case after your lender has sold your vehicle, you may find that you will be unable to get it back.  If your car is repossessed in Pittsburgh, you should call an experienced bankruptcy lawyer immediately.  Give yourself the best chance to get a fresh start and get back on your feet.  Expert bankruptcy professionals may be able to help you get your car back quickly through a bankruptcy case.

How Will Bankruptcy Affect My Credit?

(412) 925-8194

Importance of Credit.

Effect of Bankruptcy on Credit

Understand the impact that filing a bankruptcy case could have on your credit score.  You may be surprised.

Understanding the Interplay Between Your Credit Score and Filing a Bankruptcy Case.

Generally, individuals considering the to file a voluntary bankruptcy petition already have at least some issues with their credit.  Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyers generally discuss those credit issues during a free initial consultation with their clients.  Especially when it comes to chapter 7 bankruptcy cases, individuals typically consider filing to escape a dire financial situation.  Even consumers who pay their minimum payments on time may have poor credit scores because of very high debt to income ratios.  Often the maxed-out credit cards are accompanied by several late payments.  Worse, many consumers give up on even the minimum credit card payments but still remain reluctant to file a bankruptcy case.

(412) 925-8194

Filing a Bankruptcy Case Might Actually Improve Your Credit.

The filing of a bankruptcy case is an adverse credit event which, in isolation, might appear to result in a reduction to your credit score.  However, continued default on credit facilities, non-reduction of debt and no exercise of credit could be worse than taking the affirmative step a bankruptcy case to address your financial issues.  A bankruptcy case could be the quickest way to correct a badly skewed debt to income ratio.  Your credit score might also be dramatically improved when certain of your creditors’ claims are retired.  Because there are rarely quick-fixes for credit issues, it is often helpful to consider how your financial condition might change within the next 24 months.

If you’re waiting to find out how your credit score might change after a bankruptcy case, you owe it to yourself to have a free initial consultation with an experienced Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyer.

(412) 925-8194

Refusing to File Bankruptcy Could Delay Your Fresh Start.

For consumer debtors, chapter 7 bankruptcy usually means a fresh start after getting a discharge.  The chapter 7 process moves quite quickly in comparison to the timeline of a chapter 13 case.   In chapter 13, debtors  pay a portion of what they owe to their creditors over a period of three to five years.  It doesn’t take long for debtors find that the chapter 13 plan period is not a prison sentence.  When a chapter 13 plan is confirmed it strikes a new deal between a debtor and her creditors.  At the successful conclusion of that chapter 13 plan, debtors are rewarded with a completion discharge (in fact, the chapter 13 discharge is actually more broad than the quick chapter 7 discharge ).

(412) 925-8194

A Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer Can Help You Establish Your Path Forward.

For many people in financial distress, the path outward is not entirely clear.  People are sometimes overcome by the weight of their then-present conditions and can’t see forward to a reasonable future as careful stewards of their own assets.  In other cases, people financially incapable of caring for themselves could overcommit to their responsibilities.  For a true idea of of your financial future, please contact us for a free initial consultation.

(412) 925-8194

 

We are a debt relief agency.  We help people file for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.  We are proud to have continuously expanded our clients, reach and success rate.   Please contact us if you have a challenging bankruptcy or commercial law concern.  We are excited to review your condition with you.

 

Will the President Elect’s Experiences in Bankruptcy Court Help to Expand Access to Bankruptcy for Consumer Debtors in Pittsburgh?

donald-j-trump-1271634_960_720A Pittsburgh Bankruptcy Lawyer Considers Whether a New President Might Stir Changes in Bankruptcy Law

When Donald Trump takes the oath of office, he will not be the first executive to have resorted to our nation’s bankruptcy law. Some of our most venerable Presidents have been debtors in bankruptcy cases including Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe and Abraham Lincoln. However, the shape of bankruptcy law has changed dramatically since the days of Lincoln. In fact, the United States Bankruptcy Code underwent a very dramatic overhaul in 2005 with its modification through the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA).

BAPCPA set in place certain restrictions for consumer debtors seeking a fresh start. Such debtors are required to undergo a course in credit counseling prior to filing a voluntary bankruptcy petition. The course must be administered by an approved agency and may vary in cost from approximately $15 to $25. The credit counseling course can generally be completed in-person or by telephone but many people find it most convenient to complete the course online. Once the course is completed, the approved counseling provider will generate a certificate of completion which it will direct to the bankruptcy lawyer for filing on the first day of the bankruptcy case.   In certain rare instances, debtors may file their bankruptcy case without completing the course and then submit a certificate of exigent circumstances which could excuse tardy compliance with the pre-petition credit counseling rule.

BAPCPA also brought with it a means test that sometimes creates a rebuttable presumption of abuse when debtors in cases under chapter 7 have monthly income in excess of relevant median income for their state. Often in those cases, the Office of the United States Trustee will issue an inquiry letter upon such debtors or their counsel requesting support for the determination that a particular chapter 7 filing is not abusive.

As a matter of policy, the present design of the Bankruptcy Code encourages filing cases under chapter 13 rather than chapter 7. Through chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, debtors may pay some or all of their debts over a period of three to five years. A chapter 13 “reorganization” bankruptcy has some special attributes and it may often present a more favorable outcome for people in certain financial positions. For instance, chapter 13 may offer the best hope for a person attempting to save their home from foreclosure.

The Bankruptcy Code also places strict restrictions upon debtors’ eligibility to for a discharge for a period of time after having received a bankruptcy discharge in a prior case. The law also severely limits the applicability of a bankruptcy discharge to student loan obligations and to many kinds of tax claims. If the political appetite to expand debtors’ rights existed, even very modest adjustments to the Bankruptcy Code could result in substantial relief for many consumers.

Whether the President Elect’s bankruptcy experience will affect the development of our nation’s bankruptcy laws is not clear. A less polarized Congress could be better positioned to pass new legislation. Moreover, filing the many judicial vacancies of the United States Courts will affect how the law is interpreted—not least when at least one of those appointments will be to the United States Supreme Court. For the time being, Pittsburgh bankruptcy lawyers will anxiously monitor the development of bankruptcy law.

We are a debt relief agency.  We help people file for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Bankruptcy Rights upon Moving to a New State

How Moving to Another State May Affect Your Bankruptcy Casebankruptcy-moving

People considering filing a bankruptcy case who have recently moved to another state or are planning an out of state move may need to address special considerations during the bankruptcy planning process.   Out-of-state moves can affect bankruptcy filings in at least two major ways:  the venue in which debtors may file their bankruptcy cases and the law governing how much property those debtors can keep out of the reach of their creditors.

On the question of venue, there are two factors that determine where a debtor may file a bankruptcy case.  Jurisdiction for a bankruptcy case may validly hinge upon the location of any of debtors’ domicile, residence, principal place of business or principal assets in the United States.  That’s the reason why so many large companies that seem to have little or no connection with Delaware or New York are able to file chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in bankruptcy courts in those states.  However, the second part of the venue question is one of timing.  If the relevant location was not constant for the six-month period preceding the filing of the case, jurisdiction is only appropriate in the districts where those things existed for the majority of that six-month period (or, if there were more than two jurisdictions, the one where those things were for the longest portion of that 180-day period).  For many debtors in cases under chapter 7 and chapter 13, the practical impact is often that they must have lived somewhere for longer than three months before they are able to file a bankruptcy case their new home state.

Exemption rights are the legal rights available to debtors under the Bankruptcy Code to shield property from their creditors. The nature of those substantive rights depends on the debtors’ residence.  Congress left it to the individual states to determine whether a state’s residents could chose between the federal or state exemption schemes or were limited to either the state or federal exemptions.  Debtors are entitled to the exemption law of the state in which they have been domiciled for the two-year period preceding the filing of their bankruptcy cases.  However, if a debtor has not lived in one state for the entirety of that two-year period, the debtor’s exemptions will be determined according to the law of the state in which his or her domicile was located for the majority of the six-month period preceding the two-year period before the case was filed (whew!).

In most instances, Pennsylvania residents who file consumer bankruptcy cases can chose between the state and federal exemptions. The election of an exemption scheme is an important and consequential decision. An experienced bankruptcy lawyer can help with that selection in order to maximize your exemptions rights.

For a free initial consultation with a Pittsburgh bankruptcy attorney, contact Robleto Law, PLLC.

412-925-8194

info@robletolaw.com

Robleto Law, PLLC Three Gateway Center 401 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1306 Pittsburgh, PA 15222

We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.